planning document Plympton Pathfields, Planning Conditions


Plymouth City Council Conditions What Plymouth City Council have said
Environment Agency Conditions What the Environment Agency have said
Division of land Area A : Development land formerly owned by Stephens Dairies

Area B : Watermeadow formerly owned by Stephens Dairies

Area C : Land formerly owned by Plymouth City Council (valued at £175,000 and sold by Plymouth City Council for £80,000)

Area D : Area of protected trees retained by Plymouth City Council

Area E : Land formerly owned by Stephens Dairies given over to Plymouth City Council

Areas A&C : Planning Application Number 98/1329: 13 dwellings

Area B : Planning Application Number 98/1330: 18 dwellings

Click here to see the development plans and house designs

Plymouth City Council Conditions

98/1329 (Area A&C)

98/1330 (Area B, watermeadow)

 

 

Replacement of the Longbrook culvert will require the formal written approval of the Agency under Section 23 of the Water resources Act 1991; similar consent will be required for the works in the watercourses such as surface water headwalls, diversions, etc.

Raising ground levels on site to reduce the flood risk to the development must not be done at the expense of increasing the flood risk upstream by obstructing out-of-bank flows.

The watercourse within the site should be diverted to the western [should read eastern] side of the proposed Devon Bank/Hedge; this measure seeks to retain the watercourse as an open feature that has ecological amenity and aesthetic value, and will remove any associated maintenance problems that may arise by it flowing through a garden.  The plan and section of the new watercourse should: mirror existing feature, or; be non-uniform (i.e. with variation in bank slopes and incorporating meanders), or; include banks with a broken profile to form ledges, thus creating a two-stage channel.

The diverted channel should be of the same area as the existing, preferably larger.   The Agency recommends the relocation of any aquatic vegetation from the existing channel to the newly excavated feature (their Conservation Officer will advise if required).  The watercourse should be retained as an open feature and the bank left in an unengineered form; the aesthetic and ecological aspects of the riverbank can be enhanced by the adoption of positive landscaping measures.  The use of native species is preferable for this, as they tend to have greater conservation value. The Environment Agency can be contacted on 01208-78301.

What Plymouth City Council have said.....

"We [Local Planning Authority] would not agree to the raising of dwelling levels if this would result in significantly higher levels than those stipulated on the plans." Paul Westrope, Principal Planner, Plymouth City Council, letter dated 21st October 1999.

"The Council will expect no development to take place before all necessary conditions have been complied with."  Paul Westrope, Principal Planner, Plymouth City Council, letter dated 21st October 1999.

"The developers are in regular liaison with Officers of the Council and are fully aware of the requirements of the conditions attached to the planning permissions which require certain works to be carried out in advance of development on site commencing.  In the event of development commencing prematurely, the matter would of course be re-assessed and appropriate action taken which could include the serving of a Breach of Condition Notice or Enforcement Notice.  I confirm that the Section 106 Agreement was signed prior to outline planning permission reference 1848/89 being issued in November 1998.  The remaining Pathfields land is to be offered to the City Council two weeks after the commencement of development on site."  Paul Westrope, Principal Planner, Plymouth City Council, letter dated 2nd June 2000.

Pathfields Preservation Group note - Beazer Homes have confirmed to Plymouth City Council that construction work began on Monday 7th August 2000 without the Council's knowledge.  This means that legal proceedings to secure the adjacent 7 acres of land to be owned by Plymouth City Council should begin on Monday 21st August 2000 - this is likely to take several months to complete.

Environment Agency Conditions

98/1329 (Area A&C)

98/1330 (Area B, watermeadow)

  1. Mirror existing feature, or
  2. Be non-uniform (i.e. with variation in bank slopes and incorporating meanders), or
  3. Include banks with a broken profile to form ledges, thus creating a two-stage channel.

The diverted channel should be of the same area as the existing, preferably larger.   We recommend the relocation of aquatic vegetation from the existing channel to the newly excavated feature.  Our [Environment Agency] Conservation officer is available for advice if required.

As there is no significant nature conservation value in the bank top vegetation adjacent to the watercourse, we cannot justify requesting our normal 7 metre 'buffer zone' alongside the watercourse at this site.

However, we wish to see the watercourse retained as an open feature and the bank left in an unengineered form, and would look favourably on any attempt made by the developer/landowner to enhance the aesthetic and ecological aspects of the river bank by the adoption of positive landscaping measures.  The use of native species is preferable for this, as they tend to have a greater conservation value.

What the Environment Agency have said.....

"This site lies in the floodplain of the Longbrook. We would normally object to development in the floodplain but we understand the site has an existing valid planning approval which could be implemented if this current application is refused.

If this is the case we prefer not to object to this application on floodplain grounds but to ask for certain conditions to be applied to any approval.

The Longbrook is already culverted through the site.  The proposal to replace the culverting will require the formal written approval of the Environment Agency under Section 23 of the Water Resources Act 1991.  Similar consent will be required for other works on the watercourses such as surface water headwalls, diversions etc.

Raising ground levels on the site to reduce the flood risk to the development must not be done at the expense of increasing the flood risk upstream by obstructing out-of-bank flows."  Judith Hill, Planning Liaison Team Leader, Environment Agency, Bodmin, letter to Plymouth City Council 4th August 1999.


Pathfields home page Background history What is the threat to Pathfields? The campaign to save the Pathfields Planning conditions Time Team at Plympton
News Conservation Area Status Siege mound Archaeology Photo gallery Contact the Pathfields Group